One month after the landing of A shares, Huati Technology (603679, SH) was filed a patent infringement lawsuit by its peer Guizhou Lishida Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Guizhou Restar). The incident has made the latest progress. On the evening of February 7, Huati Technology announced that one of the company's lawsuits was convicted of infringement and should compensate Guizhou Lishida for economic losses of 800,000 yuan.
On February 9th, an insider of Guizhou Restar told the reporter of “Daily Economic News†that Guizhou Restar was dissatisfied with the above judgment and will continue to file a lawsuit. Next, the company will appeal separately on the seven products allegedly infringed by Huashi Technology. At present, Guizhou Restar has already prepared the matter. Huashi Technology: Does not have a major impact on the company
In July 2017, due to alleged patent infringement, Huashi Technology, which was only one month after landing A shares, was sued by Guizhou Restar. Recently, the judgment of the lawsuit was released.
On the evening of February 7, Hua Ti Technology announced that one of the company's alleged cases, Guiyang Intermediate People's Court rejected the plaintiff's claim in Guizhou Restar. In another lawsuit, Huati Technology was sued as the third defendant for allegedly infringing Guizhou Litestar's design patents due to the installation and use of street lamps in related projects.
In this regard, Guiyang Intermediate People's Court determined that Huati Technology stopped the infringement of the exclusive design of the related products of Guizhou Restar, and compensated Guizhou Lishida for economic losses and rights protection fees totaling 800,000 yuan.
Huati Technology stated in the announcement that the above-mentioned streetlight products that were infringed by Guiyang Intermediate People's Court were not the main products of the company, and the amount involved was small. The litigation judgment in this case did not have any material adverse impact on the company's current profit or future profit.
On February 9th, relevant persons in Guizhou Restarda told the reporter of “Daily Economic News†that they believed that the above judgment was not very satisfactory. Although it was determined that Chinese sports technology constituted infringement, the amount of compensation awarded was a little too much compared with the amount of litigation. Small. The reporter noted that, according to the previous lawsuit of Guizhou Restar, the court requested the court to order Huashi Technology to jointly compensate economic losses of 9,543,700 yuan.
The "Daily Economic News" reporter noticed from the civil judgment provided by Guizhou Li Shida that in the lawsuit, Guizhou Lishida claimed that the compensation amount should be in accordance with the unit price of Chinese body science and technology winning bid of 39,900 yuan and the unit price when purchasing lamps from Guizhou Luxida. The price difference between 1.44 million yuan is calculated based on 374 sets of lamps purchased. The court held that Guizhou Luxida is the manufacturer of the relevant products and not the winning bidder. The actual loss due to the infringement should be the profit that could not be obtained if the contract could not be concluded. The loss and the winning bid price are not high. Association. As for the profits that can be obtained from Guizhou Restar, the actual loss in this case is difficult to calculate accurately because it has not been proved and the amount of the patent license fee has not been proved. Therefore, Guiyang Intermediate People's Court combined with the general standard of the Chinese sports technology lighting contract and the general profit rate of the manufacturing industry, it is determined that Huashi Technology will compensate Guizhou Restar for economic losses and reasonable expenses for rights protection totaling 800,000 yuan.
Guizhou Restar will continue to appeal
Regarding the current judgment, Guizhou Restar has expressed dissatisfaction and will appeal.
The aforementioned insiders of Restar in Guizhou revealed to the reporter of "Daily Economic News" that in the lawsuit filed by the company, including many lamps suspected of infringement by Huashi Technology, in this lawsuit, Guizhou Restar has carried out a "packaging" lawsuit. However, in accordance with the relevant requirements of intellectual property cases, an infringement should be accompanied by a lawsuit. The person pointed out that Guizhou Lisida’s lawsuit involved seven products, so it was suspected of 7 infringements. “Then we will mention it separately, we can’t mix it together. We may not have the right procedure in this case.†Said.
So, when is Guizhou Restar ready to file a lawsuit again?
The above-mentioned insiders of Guizhou Restar have said that "it is already preparing, and this time I will re-submit seven separate lawsuits." Regarding the relevant circumstances of the lawsuit, the reporter called Huati Technology on February 9th, and the staff of the China Sports Science and Technology Department said that the details can be found in the announcement. Regarding whether the company will also be involved in the above-mentioned incidents afterwards, the staff member said that if the company will make timely announcements, the remaining issues should be subject to the announcement.
We are dedicated charging solution Manufacturer since 2005.
Supply various Power Station including Portable Power Stations, Solar Power Generators, Smallest Generator etc.
Manufacturing high quality products for customers according to international standards, such as CE ROHS FCC REACH UL SGS BQB etc.
To constantly offer clients more innovative products and better services is our consistent pursuit.
portable power stations for camping, solar pow er stations, jackery portable power station
TOPNOTCH INTERNATIONAL GROUP LIMITED , https://www.itopnoobluetoothes.com